Elite opinion has decided that we can’t mention the subject
staring back at us blankly from the podium—Mark Dayton’s deteriorating public
performance abilities—because it’s a desperate and losing strategy. Ok. We
shan’t mention
it again.
Mock a candidate’s height or his mild
manner and you are a sophisticate with Oscar Wilde-caliber wit. Wonder aloud about another candidate’s
lethargy, and you are a monster. Fine, I
get it.
Instead, they tell us we should go after Dayton ’s target-rich record in office. But don’t do it too aggressively, lest we get
accused of “being mean to grandpa.” If
you are not aggressive enough, then you are not a “scrappy fighter.”
If we can modulate the tone just so (“more in sorrow than in
anger” usually plays, Shakespeare, look it up), we may be allowed a crack at
the issues of the day.
The slow motion catastrophe that is MNsure? No. We’re
told MNsure is a nation-leading
success.
They tell us Republicans need to drop
the social issues. When Republicans
drop the social issues, we’re asked “Where
are the social issues?”
Instead of issues, we’re told to focus on making that case
that Republicans can do a better job of governing. The allowable arguments have been reduced
down to a meek suggestion that, “What we need is a brief Republican interregnum to fix a few
minor problems with the progressive state so we can quickly return power to the
Democrats.”
Republicans are being boxed into the role of liberal
sherpa. Perhaps once a generation
the need may arise to have a Republican in executive office to clean up a minor
mess.
In the interim, we’re invited to bring our business acumen and
managerial experience to bear in offering the occasional suggestion on how to
make liberal government work better at the margins.
As for 2014, Republicans have
been told to abandon the playing field altogether. I understand they’ll let us know when we are
needed again. Perhaps in 2018 or 2022.
No comments:
Post a Comment