Better late than never, the Minneapolis
Star Tribune limps in today with the
acknowledgement that they were lied to by the Dayton administration about MNsure health
insurance rates. On the front page of
today’s print edition (above the fold), the Star
Tribune announces, cryptically, “MNsure
prices a weighty issue.” The subhead
reads,
Republicans say premium increases are
much higher than Gov. Dayton reported.
How odd. “Republicans,”
and many others, have been saying that since the new rates were first announced
on October 1st, more than three weeks ago. The Star
Tribune itself reported all of these facts, back on
October 1st.
So what has changed that this nearly-month-old observation
is suddenly front-page news? The Star Tribune has finally decided that
skyrocketing MNsure rates is a political story rather than a business
story. Ten days before the mid-term
elections, the Star Tribune has
handed off coverage of the MNsure rate cover up to a political reporter
(Ricardo Lopez) from its healthcare business reporter (Christopher Snowbeck).
Earlier this week, Snowbeck reported
(on the Business page) that the Dayton Administration pressured insurer
Preferred One into offering below-cost rates on the MNsure exchange. This reporting directly contradicts sweeping
denials issued by Democrat Governor Mark Dayton and members of his
Administration.
So all the facts that Snowbeck reported as business news at
the start of the month, now have to be re-reported as political news, on the
front page.
Interestingly,
the re-reporting by political reporter Lopez appears online under the headline,
Experts question MNsure average
rate increase of 4.5 percent:
Republicans say premium increases
are much higher than Gov. Dayton reported.
The original Snowbeck headline had read,
MNsure premiums to increase in 2015:
Average increase is
4.5%, but some could see much higher premium jumps.
The facts haven’t changed, but their presentation has
undergone a subtle shift, one that speaks volumes. In the Lopez re-reporting, a photo of
Commerce Commissioner Mike Rothman is featured.
Is he being set up as the fall guy?
Mark Dayton and his fellow Democrats have bet their
re-elections on the public seeing MNsure as a success story. Now that MNsure looks like something less
than a triumph, Dayton
is literally running away from the
press to avoid answering awkward questions.
Now that the Democrat narrative of modest rate increases has
collapsed, a few other items could stand for additional scrutiny. Does Minnesota
really have the nation’s lowest insurance rates? That claim has been repeated ad nauseam by the Dayton Administration
and reprinted in countless Democrat campaign ads.
What is the basis of that claim? Has anyone ever looked behind the claim and
examined it? When comparing rates across
states, are deductibles and other out-of-pocket costs incorporated?
Now that the façade has started to crumble, a Pulitzer (or
Peabody) awaits the reporter who figures it out.
No comments:
Post a Comment