Thursday, October 2, 2014

Out of Bounds

Last night, the major party candidates for governor appeared in Rochester for the first debate of the election season.  To my inexpert eye, I thought that Democrat Gov. Mark Dayton did not look well.  To my ear, his speech sounded slurred and his words jumbled.

C-Span has posted a video of the event on its website.  You can watch and judge for yourself.

If I understand correctly my Twitter correspondents from last night, to mention the quality of the Governor’s performance on stage was somehow unsporting, or impolite.

As I’ve pointed out before, until quite recently, Mark Dayton was an articulate, forceful, and clear-speaking orator.  He is no longer.  Something has changed.

I was told on Twitter to engage on the issues, but ignore the performance.  Here is my transcription of Dayton’s closing statement from the C-Span tape (it begins at the 55:00 mark).  The ALL CAPS transcription is from the C-Span closed captioning system.  The other, lowercase words are those that I filled in based on what I believe that Dayton actually said.

I WOULD SAY, parenthetically, MS. NICOLLET, I think you [unintelligible]—I don’t decide who is in the debates—I think you should be in of the other debates.  I think it is well-established that the INDEPENDENCE PARTY IS ONE OF THE MAJOR PARTIES IN THE STATE.

Mr. Horner participated on all of our debates four years ago and I THINK YOU SHOULD BE AFFORDED THE SAME OPPORTUNITY.

GOING BACK TO THE QUESTION AT HAND -- [APPLAUSE] I WAS BORN AND RAISED IN MINNESOTA.  OBVIOUSLY, THE STATE’s HAS BEEN very, very GOOD TO MY FAMILY AND to MYSELF.

I STARTED RUNNING FOR GOVERNOR IN 2009 BECAUSE I was convinced THE STATE WAS HEADED IN THE WRONG DIRECTION.  And we had EVEN in the midst of ADMITTED THE NATIONAL RECESSION, THE economic SLUMP IN MINNESOTA WAS GREATER THAN most OTHER STATES’.

THE TAX SYSTEM WAS REGRESSIVE. And, uh, IT WAS NOT GENERATING ENOUGH REVENUEs TO MEET THE NEEDS OF OUR PUBLIC EDUCATION SYSTEM FROM EARLY CHILDHOOD all the way THROUGH HIGHER EDUCATION.

I CAME IN IN JANUARY 2011.  WE WERE IN A FISCAL MESS. [unintelligible] We had A $6 BILLION budget DEFICIT FOR THE NEXT TWO YEARS.  We owed our schools $2.8 billion.

ALONG WITH the A REPUBLICAN MAJORITY IN THE Minnesota LEGISLATURE, AND MYSELF, WE CUT $2 BILLION OF SPENDING, PERMANENT [pause] CUTS IN THE STATE EXPENDITUREs. AND WE PAID OFF THE SCHOOL DEBTS OVER TIME.

WE RAISED TAXES only ON THE WEALTHIEST 2% income taxes.  In fact 2 million Minnesota MIDDLE-INCOME TAXPAYERS RECEIVED An income tax CUT IN THE LAST legislative SESSION when we [unintelligible] moved to Federal conformity.

WE INVESTED THAT MONEY IN EDUCATION.  Which, in MINNESOTA, HAS BEEN SLACKING RELATIVE TO OTHER STATES AND RELATIVE TO THEIR NEEDS.

WE INSTITUTED EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION.  ALL-DAY KINDERGARTEN. in the TWO of the most critical WAYS TO we can ADDRESS THE disparity gap and the ACHIEVEMENT GAP AND THE ABILITY OF THE SCHOOLS AND of THE SOCIETY TO HELP YOUNG PEOPLE FROM THEIR EARLY area of BIRTH ALL THE WAY UNTIL THEY CAN ENTER SOCIETY AS PRODUCTIVE ADULTS AND CITIZENS.

THAT IS THE vision I have of the FUTURE I HAVE AN of the STATE. And THAT IS the one WHY I WOULD LIKE wish TO CONTINUE AS GOVERNOR.

If I have misheard, or mis-transcribed something Dayton said, I would be happy to correct the above transcript [Ed: two updates have been made].  The highly trained professionals [or well-programmed computer] at C-Span did a heroic job of catching the gist of what Dayton said in the first pass.  In assembling the transcript I pieced together, I spend an hour and a half trying to decipher a two-minute statement.

In the end, what we have from Dayton is literal nonsense.  As for taking on the issues, I can only address what Dayton actually said.  I am unable to address what he should have said, or what he meant to say, or what the post-debate press release claims he said.

In a little more than a month, we will be electing a governor, presumably one to serve in office for the next four years.  I happen to believe that the ability to speak in public, the ability to engage in public debate on issues, is a critical skill that any chief executive should possess.

The next governor will represent all 5+ million Minnesotans to the nation and the world.  Each candidate’s ability to do so effectively is fair game for discussion, in my opinion.

[Update:  Perhaps related, Twyla Brase posted a link on Twitter to a controversy over the medical records of a Republican candidate for Lt. Governor in Texas.]

1 comment:

  1. I was there in Rochester, front row center. I thought Dayton did OK until near the end, delivering well-rehearsed lines. Many of those lines were used on Almanac recently, almost word for word I think. But yes, by the end, his speech became increasingly garbled, running sentences together, the result as you've transcribed.

    Overall, I would give Johnson the victory on points, but certainly no knockout. He'll need at least a TKO in the next debate in Moorhead and should now be able to hit hard on the phony 4.5% MnSure increase. Education should be the focus, it being held at a MnSCU campus.

    One final thought: can we have debates with a game clock? The hour went by far too quickly, partly because of TV, but also the explaining and re-explaining of the rules. And also, time lost to the IP candidate. An hour debate should be an hour of major party questions, answers, and rebuttals. Let the moderator and minor party candidates babble on their own time.

    ReplyDelete