Last month, MNsure announced the 30 recipients of a taxpayer-funded
Federal grant to promote Obamacare in the state. Lyon-Dugin Associates was one of a handful of
for-profit companies to make the list of what MNsure describes as “trusted
community organizations.”
Lyon-Dugin
Associates is a private, for-profit company owned by Bruce Lyon-Dugin and
Fran Lyon-Dugin. According to documents
on file at the Minnesota Secretary of State’s office, the company was created
on August 3, 2012. Questions remain as to how this year-old, two-person, for-profit operation so quickly rose to become one of the state's most trusted community organizations.
In the year prior to the founding of Lyon-Dugin Associates, co-founder
Bruce Lyon-Dugin was employed as a sales consultant at Macy’s downtown
As reported by Jennifer Brooks of the Minneapolis Star Tribune, co-founder Bruce Lyon-Dugin has a colorful recent
history. Brooks reports that Mr.
Lyon-Dugin “once brandished a shotgun at a Wisconsin deputy during a
traffic stop.” Brooks adds
that,
news stories about the incident and his mug shot pop up during even the most
cursory Internet search.
Here
is one such story from
It all began Thursday evening at around 7:45 p.m. when
the Lincoln County Sheriff's Department got a call about a possible drunk
driver.
Deputies said Lyon-Dugin was seen driving in the Town of
Merrill near
County Highway H. They stopped the vehicle on County Highway K near Spruce Road .
When the deputy approached, Lyon-Dugin showed a shotgun.
All of which raises questions about how much vetting MNsure
did of its grantees. Brooks reports on
some of the 70 or so applicants that did not make the cut,
Groups that applied but were not
chosen include the University of Minnesota , Children’s Hospitals of Minnesota and the Minneapolis Urban League.
MNsure reports that it has not signed contracts with any
grantees. Brooks quotes MNsure as
saying,
“MNsure has not and will not enter
into a contract with an entity prior to a complete and thorough review. To
date, MNsure has not completed this final stage for any named grantee and no
contracts have been finalized.”
In my simple world, vetting should take place before
grantees are announced. It’s not clear
whether any of the previously rejected applicants will be promoted, should one
or more announced grantees not make the cut in the belated round of due
diligence.
Only in the Banana Republic of Minnesota would we have a
process of “award first, review later.”
No comments:
Post a Comment