Local blogger Gary Gross has performed a public service by
digging into the premise behind the Democrats’ re-election campaign this
year. He transcribes the relevant
portion of an Alliance for a Better Minnesota (ABM) TV ad
supporting Democrat Gov. Mark Dayton,
Look across the land. On farms and in factories, in classrooms and
on construction sites, Minnesota
is working. Four years ago, Minnesota
faced a $5,000,000,000 deficit. But Gov. Mark Dayton showed strong leadership. He
raised taxes on the wealthiest 2 percent so we could invest in our schools and
reduce middle class taxes. Now Minnesota has 150,000
new jobs and a budget surplus.
As
you know, ABM is the well-funded “independent” political group linked by marriage and cash to Dayton ’s inner
circle. It’s fair to say that the
message above will be the one coordinated across the Dayton campaign, the state Democrat party,
and the associated independent spending groups this fall.
But
does it have any validity? Let’s start
with the 150,000 jobs claim. There is
simply no support for that figure. Based
on data at the U.S. Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics, if you
give Dayton credit for the high-water mark for jobs while he has held office
(May 2014) and subtract the employment level from before his election (October
2010) you get only 111,626 net jobs created, a far cry from 150,000.
More
to the point, if you take today’s figure (July 2014) and subtract the figure
prior to his inauguration (December 2010) you get only 96,515, less than 2/3 of
the amount claimed by ABM.
But,
can Dayton
fairly claim even the lower number? As Gross
points out in his piece, most of the claimed “new jobs” were created prior to the
passage of the higher taxes on the “wealthiest 2 percent.”
From
2011 to 2012—the first half of Dayton ’s
term—the state legislature was controlled by Republicans. Democrats achieved their current one-party
rule in St. Paul
only in January 2013. Looking
year-by-year at Dayton’s term, more jobs were created under the Republican
legislature (shown in red) than have been created so far since Dayton’s fellow
Democrats took charge (shown in blue),
In
this case, the trend is not our friend. The
hard work of pulling Minnesota
out of the Great Recession was done when the Republicans led the Legislature. From October 2010 to October 2012, the
state’s unemployment rate fell from 7.2 percent to 5.5 percent. In the time the Democrats have been in
charge, the rate has fallen further by only another 1.0 percent, to 4.5.
Looking
closer at the time period before and after Dayton ’s tax hikes and “investments” were
enacted (May 2013), the message is even more stark,
Since
the Dayton tax hikes were put into law, Minnesota has created
only a net 32,000 jobs, about 1/5 of the number claimed by ABM as a result of
the new taxes and spending. In fact,
according to data at the BLS, Minnesota
has lost jobs in each of the past two months.
And
the deficit? As I’ve pointed
out, state tax revenue collections have been falling short, of late.
ABM’s
claims fail as matters of fact, but they do make for powerful myth. Minneapolis Star Tribune reporters and
columnists reprint the ‘booming economy” narrative on a daily basis, even as
the actual figures issued by state government agencies become increasingly
dire.
The
danger is that the low information voters who decide elections will vote for
the status quo, thinking they are getting more economic boom. They’ll wake up in November to find out that
the jobs have vanished, along with the state budget surplus.
The GOP spin machine, as always, hard at work misinforming the public. To paraphrase Mr Twain, statistics don't lie, but liars sure love statistics. The statistical comparisons cited here are irrelevant, as they're too short term to have any significance. How about some statistics that demonstrate that almost a decade of Tim Pawlenty, GW Bush and a Republican Congress put both the state national economies in the toilet? There's your statistically relevant comparison, Mr Glahn.
ReplyDelete